Skip to main content

Full text of "NOTE ON THE IDENTITY OF CALLIOSTOMA SOWERBYI, PILSBRY, WITH C. HALIARCHUS, MELVILL"

See other formats


NOTE ON THE IDENTITY OF CALLIOSTOHA SOWERBYI , PILSBET, 
WITH C. HA LI ARCH US, MELYILL. 

By James Cosmo Melyill, B.L.S. 

Read 12 th November , 1909. 

In 1878 Mr. G. B. Sowerby described 1 a then unique member of the 
Trochidce, from Japan, under the name Zmjphinus jucundus . It was 
a fairly smooth shell, finely granolirate on the uppermost whorls, the 
succeeding ones, as well as the body-whorl, being almost smooth, with 
the exception of granoliration at the sutures, the aperture obliquely 
quadrate, mouth pearly. Alt. 30, diam. 33 mm. 

In January, 1889, the description 2 of Zmjphinus haliarchus, mihi, 
was published, the type being an unique shell lately presented to the 
Manchester Museum, Owens College (now the Victoria University of 
Manchester), by the executors of the late Mr. Reginald Cholmondeley, 
of Condover Hall, Shrewsbury, together with many other rare and 
valuable specimens. This fine shell was differentiated from Z. jucundus, 
Sowb., by certain characters, such as greater inflation, tenuity of 
substance, size (alt. 40, diam. 36 mm.), etc. It was also reported, 
with some queried element of doubt, to have been dredged in deep 
water off the eastern coasts of Australia. 

Now, Dr. Gould had, in 1849, already published a Zmjphinus 
under the name of Trochus jucundus, and, accordingly, when working- 
on his able monograph of the Trochkke, Dr. H. A. Bilsbry, finding it 
thus necessary to change the name of Sowerby’s shell, prepared for it 
the appellation Sowerbyi, by which it has been since known. 

Quite recently, I received from Mr. Sowerby a specimen labelled 
“ Calliostoma Sowerbyi, Pils.’h and I at once recognized it as 
identical with C. haliarchus. The following week I was able, in 
company with Mr. It. Standen, to compare it with the type, when my 
impressions were confirmed, it differing in not much else except size. 
This proves conclusively how often erroneous conclusions may be 
drawn from only reading a description, or comparing a figure, however 
well executed, when one is not able to examine the type. 

I placed the matter before Mr. Sowerby, who kindly at once gave 
me his opinion upon the subject, which was that both his name 
jucundus must yield to Dr. Gould’s, and Soioerbyi, Bilsbry, to haliarchus, 
Melv., for, though both the latter appellations were bestowed in 
1889, haliarchus was published 1st January, while Sowerbyi appeared 
in the fourth instalment (out of five) of vol. xi of the Manual, and 
therefore was published after 1st August. 


1 Proc. Zool. Soc., 1878, p. 798, pi. xlviii, fig. 6. 

2 Journ. of Conch, published January 1, 1889, vol. vi, p. 32, pi. ii, fig. 3. 




8 


PKOCEEDINGS OF THE MALA COLO GICAL SOCIETY. 


The synonymy, therefore, will stand as follows :— 

Calliostoma haliaechtjs (Melv.). 

Zizyphimis jucundus , Sowerby, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1878, p. 798, 
pi. xlviii, fig. 6 (non Gould, 1849). 

Z. haliar chits, Melvill, Journ. of Conch., vol. vi, p. 32, pi. ii, fig. 3 
(January 1, 1889). 

Calliostoma Soiverhyi , Pilsbry, ITan. Conch., 1889, vol. xi, pt. iv, 
p. 352. 

Hah. —Japan, and perhaps East Australia. 


*